Opposite Houses – “House That Wants To Fly” & “House Held Captive”

Revisiting my archives, here’s a project I did as a Student of Architecture at Pratt Institute in 1985. They were published in 1988 in The “Pratt Journal of Architecture – Form-Being-Essence” published by Rizzoli.
Click here to see the book on Pratt’s website.

House That Wants To Fly

click on images to enlarge (except for mobile phones)




House That Wants to Fly

Along a sheer cliff where the pale between earth and sky is sharply delineated, the house precariously hangs by tenuous cords.  Perched with the inflection of motion, it patiently waits to take flight.

The body of the house is dispositioned in a symmetrical arrangement as a pretense of stability.  The long staircase descending through the earth, leads to the entry of the house, continues again, and is culminated by a bridge cantilevered out in space. Secondary staircases lead to a wing-like observation deck. This assemblage of parts is a clever trick.  They construct a “flying machine” imagery so that flyers overhead may be fooled.  However, from a more earthly perspective, the house is a mere building.

Like gravity, freedom is a constant endeavor to be maintained.  Never will the house be able to escape this earth binding force, but the essence of its form is the quintessential emotion of freedom:  FLYlNG.

Opposite Houses published in the
Pratt Journal of Architecture: Form; Being; Absence
Rizzoli Books 1988


House Held Captive

House Held Captive - Model

House Held Captive - Plan & Section

House That Wants to Fly

The house is a microcosm of an oppressive regime. The composition is a scenario of order and domination.

The house is placed in a sinkhole (the borders of a nation).  The sinkhole naturally oppresses in geographic terms.  Within this domain is an arrangement of geometry’s. A circular ring places rigorous control over a square, golden rectangle and equilateral triangle, locking them in a static dialogue. Oppression is maintained through this austere order intolerable of change. The geometry’s live among each other in delusive equality but this is not a democratic cohabitation. The SQUARE dominates in size and has the advantage of peaking above and beyond the circle.

With this salient position, it can see the truth while the others are kept in the dark.